Taylor Swift’s legal team is done being polite. In a Los Angeles federal court, her lawyers asked a judge to dismiss Maren Wade’s trademark lawsuit over the album title“The Life Of A Showgirl,”calling the case“nonsensical.”Wade, a former Las Vegas showgirl who writes a column called“Confessions Of A Showgirl,”claims Swift’s album and merch confuse consumers and infringe on a brand she spent twelve years building.
Swift’s team argues the opposite: no reasonable person would confuse a global music icon with Wade’s podcast, book, or live cabaret performances. They also challenged whether the court even has jurisdiction over Swift, who lives in Tennessee. Wade’s lawyer fired back that the power imbalance is the point, saying her client’s brand got“absorbed in real time into a multi-billion dollar commercial machine.”
The timing matters here.“The Life Of A Showgirl”dropped in October 2025 and became the best-selling album of the year, and the Encore edition with four new tracks arrives September 25, 2026. Wade wants damages and an order blocking Swift from using the name. So the real question is whether one independent creator can hold a title against a superstar. What do you think, should Swift keep the name?
About the Author
Local Lawton
Local Lawton is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.