When a tweet posted from Rep. Andy Ogles’account declared there’s no place for homosexuality in America, the Tennessee Congressman had a ready explanation: blame the staffer. But here’s where things get squirrelly—when pressed on whether he actually disagreed with that sentiment, Ogles suddenly became very interested in changing the subject.
Thursday on Capitol Hill, Ogles called the tweet“stupid”and“inappropriate,”which sounds like a clean disavowal. But that’s where the clarity ends. A reporter repeatedly asked him a simple yes-or-no question: do you agree or disagree with the comment? Each time, Ogles bobbed and weaved, offering deflections instead of a straight answer. For a public official, the refusal to clearly state whether he believes LGBTQ+ people have a place in America is telling—especially when it’s so easy to just say no.
What makes this more complicated is the pattern. Ogles has made similar sweeping statements about other groups in the past, like Muslims, and he doubled down on those remarks rather than walking them back. The homosexuality tweet, though? He insists a staffer wrote it. That might be plausible if he’d followed up with a firm, unequivocal statement of his actual position. He didn’t.
So that leads to the real question: if a staffer posted hateful content on his official account, why was the response a simple reprimand? For a Congressman who’s made a career of strong takes on culture and identity, his sudden evasiveness here speaks volumes. When politicians won’t answer basic questions about their beliefs, it’s usually because the honest answer would cost them.
About the Author
Local Lawton
Local Lawton is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.