Nick Reiner appeared in Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday for a hearing on whether grand jury transcripts from the proceedings that led to his indictment should be made public. Judge Sam Ohta did not issue a ruling, continuing the matter to October 21. That date now becomes the next major moment in a case that has drawn intense attention since the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner in December 2025.
One notable shift Wednesday: Reiner was not handcuffed to his chair as he had been in previous appearances, though his hands remained individually cuffed. He was observed glaring at prosecutors and appearing bored during the hearing. Reiner, 33, faces two counts of first-degree murder and has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors have said they will not seek the death penalty, meaning a conviction would carry a sentence of life without parole.
The transcripts at issue could reveal what a grand jury heard before indicting Reiner, which is why the October 21 decision matters well beyond the courtroom. A trial is not expected before 2027. Until then, each hearing offers another small window into a story that keeps the public watching.
Do you think grand jury transcripts in high-profile cases should be released to the public? Sound off in the comments.
About the Author
Local Lawton
Local Lawton is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.