Congressman Ro Khanna has found himself in a royal kerfuffle after King Charles III reportedly declined to meet with survivors of Jeffrey Epstein during his U.S. visit. Khanna was hoping for a meaningful conversation about the issues surrounding sex trafficking, especially after being promised by the British Ambassador, Sir Christian Turner, that the King would engage with these survivors. As it turns out, Charles had other plans—namely, staying away from a roundtable discussion on the very topic of abuse.
Sky Roberts, brother of Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre, added his voice to the chorus of disappointment, criticizing the King’s absence. He characterized it as a significant missed opportunity for royal acknowledgment and support. According to the British Royal Family, the absence was tied to ongoing police inquiries in the U.K., but many see it as a failure to demonstrate empathy during a troubling time. Are royals untouchable, or is this a moment where they should step down from their thrones and listen?
While some might understand the complexities at play, it’s hard not to see how Charles’s no-show sends a message to those still seeking justice. With so many powerful figures remaining unaccountable, maybe it’s time for the monarchy to reconsider their stance on these critical conversations. This instance brings to light a larger question: when will those in power take a stand?
About the Author
Local Lawton
Local Lawton is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.