It’s a story that plays out in family courts across America, but when it involves someone who earned nine figures in the NBA, the stakes and the contradiction hit differently. Trevor Ariza’s ex-wife, Bree Anderson, has filed court documents alleging that the former Lakers player is sidestepping $14,000 in monthly child and spousal support while simultaneously living a lifestyle that screams financial comfort.
Here’s where it gets murky. Ariza is claiming he makes around $6,000 per month these days—a staggering drop from his NBA years—plus roughly $667 from a Buffalo Wild Wings investment. Yet Anderson argues he’s actually pulling in over $50,000 monthly, and she’s using Instagram as her evidence. She points to international trips to Turks and Caicos in March and June 2026, Rolex watches, and Chanel handbags appearing in his girlfriend’s social media stories. Those kinds of purchases, Anderson’s filing suggests, don’t exactly scream financial hardship.
The numbers are genuinely striking when you zoom out. Ariza earned over $100 million during his NBA career. A court ordered him in January 2024 to pay $14,000 in combined child and spousal support per month. He also owes an additional $36,000 remaining from an equalization payment tied to their property settlement. That’s not chump change for most families, but it’s pocket lint compared to what he made as a professional athlete.
Anderson herself makes around $11,000 per month but reports expenses of $29,000—meaning she’s operating at a significant monthly shortfall even before factoring in the unpaid support. She’s not claiming poverty; she’s claiming that her ex is living large while sidestepping his obligations. The court documents suggest a pattern: Trevor claims he can’t pay, yet evidence surfaces of luxury spending that contradicts that claim.
This isn’t unique to celebrity divorces, but the scale is. The real question isn’t whether someone can afford a Rolex—it’s whether they’re being honest about their actual income. If Ariza’s real monthly take is truly $6,000, those luxury purchases would be reckless. If it’s closer to what Anderson alleges, then the whole narrative shifts. The court will have to sort it out, but for now, his ex-wife is making it clear that the gap between what he’s claiming and what he appears to be spending is too wide to ignore.
About the Author
Local Lawton
Local Lawton is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.